Coding 2022-12-02
It looks really complicated, but actually it can be very simple, unless I'm badly mistaken and it has to be extremely complicated.
It looks really complicated, but actually it can be very simple, unless I'm badly mistaken and it has to be extremely complicated.
Maybe I should re-evaluate the names before I work on the coverage? I don't know...
The bad names are still bad.
I think this went pretty well for this time of year. I will not check to confirm.
On the road again again.
It'd be cool if this were obvious a priori, but a posteriori is better than nothing.
It's really gratifying that there weren't problems where there weren't supposed to be problems.
Discarding ideas that didn't quite work. Maybe I'll be able to re-satisfy their purpose, if I can show that I need to.
What does this code do? Breaks everything, probably.
On the road again...