Weekly Roundup 2023-07-25
I mean, I still don't know if it works, but it should work better.
I mean, I still don't know if it works, but it should work better.
I'm not really focusing on algorithmic properties, just, like, what offends my sensibilities as a Zachtronics enjoyer?
I think I changed a few lines back and forth several times.
I shouldn't be trying to read the code this late, but props to OCaml for being so readable once I get a basic handle on the syntax.
Not sure I'm supposed to have four close parens in a row.
My laptop turned on immediately after I edited a message onto the front page saying that it wouldn't. Thanks for the tech support.
"This looks complicated. *does it*" is always a classic.
Gradually getting a better handle on both OCaml and Earley parsers.
This is going to be weird and sprawling, but let's see how it goes.
This code is going to be so elegant, it'll have its pinky out for literally all beverages.