Coding 2022-12-15
Improving the test revealed that I was missing some key data in the metadata objects I was creating, so it's good I got that out of the way.
Improving the test revealed that I was missing some key data in the metadata objects I was creating, so it's good I got that out of the way.
My code's not magic. I just... I needed to verify that...
This is one of the things that you know it's good for you because it's unpleasant.
Expert on relevant code shrugs and says "lol i dunno"
I appreciate that the code was simple enough that it all worked on the first try (modulo errors at the usage site that had nothing to do with the way I wrote the code)
Just a little bit at a time, just a little bit at a time...
Not sure what "a good interface" even looks like in this context.
It's nice to finally be in a mood to increase the coverage.
Maybe there's some kind of sampling bias, because the "obviously correct" code is usually easy to cover, so if I haven't covered a function completely, it's probably doing something horrible. Even if that's the case, I, um, don't care.
Just a little bit at a time, and it adds up.