Coding 2022-12-09
I appreciate that the code was simple enough that it all worked on the first try (modulo errors at the usage site that had nothing to do with the way I wrote the code)
I appreciate that the code was simple enough that it all worked on the first try (modulo errors at the usage site that had nothing to do with the way I wrote the code)
Just a little bit at a time, just a little bit at a time...
Not sure what "a good interface" even looks like in this context.
It's nice to finally be in a mood to increase the coverage.
Maybe there's some kind of sampling bias, because the "obviously correct" code is usually easy to cover, so if I haven't covered a function completely, it's probably doing something horrible. Even if that's the case, I, um, don't care.
Just a little bit at a time, and it adds up.
It looks really complicated, but actually it can be very simple, unless I'm badly mistaken and it has to be extremely complicated.
Maybe I should re-evaluate the names before I work on the coverage? I don't know...
The bad names are still bad.
I think this went pretty well for this time of year. I will not check to confirm.