Coding 2025-01-19
This is going to be a delicate refactor, because on paper the code is already doing most of what it should be, it's just that the implementation is confusingly non-ideal.
This is going to be a delicate refactor, because on paper the code is already doing most of what it should be, it's just that the implementation is confusingly non-ideal.
It's time to start having fun again.
It feels good to change these names to something.
Not rushing, but I dearly hope to make a change that gives me the confidence to move faster.
It remains to be seen whether I'll stay with this idea, but I'm definitely going to try it out.
I can't tell if this reads as nonsense to everyone else, which is a problem...
This is perhaps... not coherent. Oh well.
Lots of my statements about code coverage are mainly intended to bother people who don't feel that it's a useful metric. I don't have any reason for doing this besides that I think it's funny.
It went up by like 0.1 percent. Brutal.
A small bit of housekeeping.