Coding 2022-12-01
Maybe I should re-evaluate the names before I work on the coverage? I don't know...
Maybe I should re-evaluate the names before I work on the coverage? I don't know...
The bad names are still bad.
I think this went pretty well for this time of year. I will not check to confirm.
It'd be cool if this were obvious a priori, but a posteriori is better than nothing.
It's really gratifying that there weren't problems where there weren't supposed to be problems.
Discarding ideas that didn't quite work. Maybe I'll be able to re-satisfy their purpose, if I can show that I need to.
What does this code do? Breaks everything, probably.
So close to making test improvements! How exciting!
It would be cool if I could remember that this is how stuff works, but oh well.
At least I know what these bits of dead code are for.